Feet persecond6/6/2023 The West Fork at Woodfords is forecast to crest at 13.4 feet or minor flood stage at 1 a.m. That segment of the river coming into Carson Valley crested at 12.86 feet 10:40 p.m. As of Saturday morning, that forecast has backed down to 13.5 feet, which would still be the highest the river has been this spring. Sunday thanks to snow melting at upper elevations. Only two days ago, the Carson River at Horseshoe Bend was forecast to hit 14.3 feet by 5 a.m. By Monday night, it’s forecast to crest at 6,140 cubic feet per second at the Carson gauge, eliminating a half-dozen low guessers as it rises to 9.2 feet.īetting the river’s peak flow is not an easy matter. Thursday, the river was at 3,050 cubic feet per second. Get the latest news and weather delivered straight to your inbox.The closest thing to the betting line on the seasonal crest of the Carson River ranges from 4,000 to just over 13,000 cubic feet per second.Įvery year, the Carson Water Subconservancy conducts a peak flow contest, where river watchers bet on when and how much water will go past the gauge south of Prison Hill in Carson City.Įven the most optimistic hydro-nosticator believes the river will reach its peak flow by Carson Valley Days and most of the guesses run below 9,000 cubic feet in the weeks after Memorial Day.Īs of 4 p.m. Ultimately, his amendment failed on a vote of 11-32.ĭownload our apps today for all of our latest coverage. That means we would be spending this $125 million to get additional canal capacity that we already have a right to,” he said.Ĭavanaugh introduced an amendment to reduce appropriations for the Canal project by $125 million. “If that water is not diverted by a canal it would go into the Platte River into the state of Nebraska. Some senators, like John Cavanaugh, argued that Nebraska would be entitled to that water even without the canal. “Let me tell you, it will require the same amount of land, the same amount of easement and eminent domain, whether it's 500 or 1000,” said Sen. Rural senators, mostly from western Nebraska where the canal would be built, argued that the extra capacity could help capture excess snow melt and high precipitation events that could add to Nebraska water reserves. I don’t see the function or purpose of spending an additional $125 million on doing that,” said Sen. “If we are able to successfully achieve what we can achieve with the Canal with just a 500 CFS canal versus a 1000 CFS canal. Some senators are questioning if that extra capacity is worth the extra cost. Under the compact with Colorado, Nebraska is entitled to 500 cubic feet per second (CFS) of water but the budget calls for a canal built to handle twice that amount of water. When I look at the Perkins County Canal now I look at that as a project that is going to support our ability to continue to irrigate,” said Sen. Not only for drinking but for our economy. “It is essential that when we are looking across the state we are prioritizing water and water infrastructure. Several Nebraska senators would like to see increased capacity of the canal, but that comes with additional cost and not everyone in the Unicameral thinks the expanded canal is worth it. OMAHA, Neb (KMTV) - The Perkins County Canal was originally proposed as a $500 million dollar project to secure water flowing out of Colorado, which would include a canal and a series of reservoirs to store the water.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |